IA Part 1 - Identification and Evaluation of Sources

Section 1: Identification and Evaluation of Sources

In Section 1, you will analyse two key sources used in your investigation. The sources can be either primary or secondary sources. In this section you must:

clearly state the question you have chosen to investigate (this must be stated as a question)
include a brief explanation of the nature of the two sources you have selected for detailed analysis, including an explanation of their relevance to the investigation
analyse two sources in detail. With reference to the origins, purpose and content, you should analyse the value and limitations of the two sources in relation to the investigation.
Recommended word allocation: 500 words.
Maximum amount of marks that can be awarded: 6 out of 25 total marks.

A crucial element of this section of the internal assessment task is formulating an appropriate question to investigate. The six key concepts for the history course (causation, consequence, continuity, change, significance and perspectives) can be a useful starting point in helping you to formulate a question. (Source, IB History Guide, p84)

Assessment Criteria for Section 1

0: The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 -2

The question for investigation has been stated.
The student has identified and selected appropriate sources, but there is little or no explanation of the relevance of the sources to the investigation.
The response describes, but does not analyse or evaluate, two of the sources.

3 - 4

An appropriate question for investigation has been stated.
The student has identified and selected appropriate sources, and there is some explanation of the relevance of the sources to the investigation.
There is some analysis and evaluation of two sources, but reference to their value and limitations is limited.

5 - 6

An appropriate question for investigation has been clearly stated.
The student has identified and selected appropriate and relevant sources, and there is a clear explanation of the relevance of the sources to the investigation.
There is a detailed analysis and evaluation of two sources with explicit discussion of the value and limitations of two of the sources for the investigation, with reference to the origins, purpose and content of the two sources.

This is a checklist for a successful Section 1, based on the assessment criteria.

You have selected an appropriate question which can be dealt with within the 2200 word limit.
You have stated your question clearly. (Verbatim is best)
You have identified and selected appropriate and relevant sources to analyse.
You have clearly explained the relevance of these two sources to your investigation.
You have included a detailed analysis and evaluation of two sources with explicit discussion of the value and limitations of two of the sources for the investigation, with reference to the origins, purpose and content of the two sources.

Breakdown of the key components of the assessment criteria

"Clear statement of an appropriate question for the investigation"

You must ensure that the question you have generated is clear, concise and is contestable
In the first paragraph of your Section 1, you need to provide the context of your investigation, and then directly state your research question, in its full form, and make it stand out.

"Identification of sources, and explanation of the relevance of the sources to the investigation."

From the sources you are using for your investigation, you will need to select two to evaluate.
It is advisable that when making this selection, you ensure there is at least one point of difference between the selected sources. For example, you would not select two photos to evaluate,as their limitations and uses may be similar. Likewise, choosing to evaluate two Marxist historical perspectives would not be as effective as one Marxist and one Revisionist viewpoint, or a contemporary source and a cross - referenced source written some years after the event. Selection of the appropriate sources is critical to scoring well against this criterion. See the advice below for further guidance.
You will also need to ensure that you are providing, in 1 or 2 sentences only, an explanation of the relevance of each chosen source to your investigation. For example, if you select a piece of propaganda as one of your sources, you MUST explain how that source plays a part in your investigation. What does it provide that adds to your argument?

"Analysis and evaluation of two sources with discussion of their value and limitations, with reference to the origins, purpose and content."

The expectation is that, for each source, you provide a distinct, clearly identified paragraph or two that address both value AND limitations, and uses origin, purpose, and content as supporting evidence. This should be done explicitly (i.e. use the actual words origin, purpose and content when doing this....don't just assume the reader knows you're referring to them)
Each source will need to be addressed separately, and identifying it specifically as a subheading or italicising it is recommended.
This element is similar to the requirements for the OPCVL question in Paper 1, so the skills required are transferable.

You will need to clearly and specifically identify the origin of the documents. State the name of the author(s), and also it is recommended that you outline the provenance, by exploring the context within which the source was created and looking at the background and expertise or involvement of the author. Be specific, and try to use the word ‘origin’ clearly - you may wish to make it bold print.

Another requirement is that you explore the value and/or limitations of the purpose of the sources.
Why was it created? What is it designed to do? So, for example, a newspaper article is written for the general public, and its purpose is to provide a perspective regarding an event or set of events. A table of statistics is designed to present a set of data regarding a certain topic. Be specific, and try to use the word ‘purpose’ clearly - you may wish to make it bold print.

It is important that you address the content of the source, as this is a new element of the IB History programme. So, you will need to provide an overview or summary of the message of the source, and specific information that the source conveys. Be specific, and try to use the word ‘content’ clearly - you may wish to make it bold print.

Advice on choosing sources

One of the challenges of this section is to choose two sources from your investigation which target the criterion. The keywords are 'the student has identified and selected appropriate and relevant sources'.

One way to think about this is to consider which two sources you have used most in your investigation. However, you may have relied on these two sources just because they helped you understand the topic best. These two sources may be quite similar in what they offered and thus you may be wise to consider just one of these and search for a more appropriate contrasting source.
Another way is to consider which two sources are central to the contention of your question, or that contribute most to the debate. This begins to target the appropriate part of the criterion.
Some sample responses indicated that a primary and secondary source are chosen in order to highlight differences in perspective on the topic. This can be helpful when you go to discuss the value and limitations of the sources for the investigation.
It might be wise to evaluate a few of your sources before you settle on the two that will appear in this section.
Much of your choice will hinge on the question you have chosen...remember to aim for a relatively narrow scope to your question.